On average, authors took about 11 weeks to resubmit, nearly as long as HSR took to get reviews. Then, yes, I will pull the story from my rotation and revise it. The dates that are typically published alongside papers Received, Revised, Accepted, Published are important. It indicates that the editor has seen some merit in your study, but it is not publishable in its current form. Another problem being reported by journal editors is that authors are ignoring reviewer comments. But, there can be a resignation to accept an okay paper at this point too. If so, Id like to hear how methodological soundness would be judged in the humanities since there are so many competing methodologies. I am afraid that it might be not possible using flow. I'm just not active enough in research (I'm in a 100% clinical position w/ the VA) to know. Learn about our Transparent Peer Review pilot in collaboration with Publons and ScholarOne (part of Clarivate, Web of Science). Look for controversies and unexplained findings. They are not necessarily those held by the Society for Scholarly Publishing nor by their respective employers. Be kind to yourself and give yourself time to deal with the rejection. Reject and Resubmit (or revise and resubmit) (hereafter, R&R) = your article has been rejected. Did my dues and checked out their published works before I choose this journal. Do they address the main question posed? For journals that are looking to publish top tier content, passable is not good enough. If the time from received to accepted is too short, questions may be raised about the paper. The research topic was of little significance: Bad writing: If the language, structure, or figures are so poor that the merit of the paper cant be assessed, then the paper will be rejected. If you suspect there are biased reviews, appeal to the editor for reconsideration of your rejected manuscript. The mission of the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) is to advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking. Receiving a rejection letter from the journal editor for your manuscript is painful. All Rights Reserved. I agree that time to first decision is important but the public stats dont show this at all.. Whats the meaning of reject and resubmit ? So, what does a journals editorial decision of major revisions mean? Inaccurate conclusions on assumptions that are not supported by your data. How long should revise and resubmit letters be? There was no way to tell in the final publication that the paper had gone through this process prior to being submitted to Journal B. Under If rejected branch, you are going to send an email to the customer. Im grateful for my time in New York book publishing for many reasons, utmost because it allows me to offer insight into the burning questions my editing clients have. On average, authors took about 11 weeks to resubmit, nearly as long as HSR took to get reviews. Webstudents to revise and resubmit a draft after receiving comments from the instructor. are registered trademarks of Gold Biotechnology, Inc. We use cookies and other tools on this site. It indicates that the editor has seen some merit in your study, but it is not publishable in its current form. After you are all set, you can start planning for the manuscript resubmission. It might be rejected immediately, of course. Editors are human beings and they will talk to you. Assess whether or not you agree with each agents feedback. The claim rejection rate measures the percentage of claims that were denied by insurers, as opposed to accepted and paid. [CDATA[// >